Why is the fedora.us (Fedora Extras) repository growing so slowly??

[Jaap A. Haitsma]

Warren Togami wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote about powernowd:
> 
>> make a mistake with such a small package. If, however, you'd be happy 
>> when
>> somone compared the source tarball MD5 with the upstream release, that
>> might help. Afterall, in the source you're listed as contributor.
>>
> 
> Yes, and that is why I suggested the "Source Audit Clause" which would 
> make it possible to publish this and other cases where nobody else cares 
> enough to look at it.
> 
This seems like a good proposal to me.

Just a remark from previous discussions.
I think if there aren't many people interested to do QA on a package it 
isn't because there isn't any need or interest for the package in 
general. Quite often I read something on the web about a program and 
then try to find an rpm for it. Or I need some rpm to get something else 
compiled. And by definition there are less packagers then users out there.
So to conclude I think that if there is no interest in doing QA does not 
really mean that there is no interest in the package.

Jaap