On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:45:46PM -0500, Stan Bubrouski wrote: > On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 18:13, Alan Cox wrote: > > Pine isnt in Fedora anyway 8) > > I've never liked pine, but I've always found pico to be quite useful, > any chance of it being included, or are there licenese problems with > including it at all? See "nano" instead