Questions about some default packages Fedora project

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le lun 03/11/2003 à 19:38, Alan Cox a écrit :
> > 1. How come we only have a limited number of Window Managers in Fedora?
> > i.e only (GNOME, KDE and twm)
> 
> Because Fedora at the moment is turning from "Red Hat" to community.
> Within Red Hat the business needs didn't favour it. Duplication costs
> engineering time. It also annoys business customers who want what they
> perceive as consistency.
> 
> With Fedora now of course the rules are different since anyone can begin
> adding packages (and indeed www.fedora.us has a collection so far, plus
> a need for more QA folks, so if your favourite toy is there help QA it)
> 
> > Is it possible to make it available to apt-repositories of Fedora?
> 
> Should be. The general favourite seems to be yum but apt works too. I'm
> not sure if yum direct off sf.net works with all their weird redirect 
> stuff

Sf has an "ftp-only" kind of service.
We use it for JPackage apt/yum/urpmi repositories (many thanks to the sf
team btw - the eu mirror sucks but the us one is great)

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20031103/ece0c4e5/attachment-0002.bin