FC2 release dates
Michael K. Johnson
johnsonm at redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 21:13:46 UTC 2003
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:30:41PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Jeremy Katz <katzj at redhat.com>:
> > Having things so that both 2.4 and 2.6 work mean that the integration of
> > 2.6 isn't going to be as smooth.
>
> Agreed. I don't know if my opinion counts for anything in this, nor
> even if it should. But I'd like to see FC2 go for 2.6 all the way
> unless 2.6 has showstopper problems.
I'll stick my neck out and say: It's either 2.4 or 2.6, no middle
ground. If 2.6 isn't good enough to not need an alternative, then
we've got a problem. But I don't think we'll have a problem; 2.6
is progressing much more nicely than 2.4 did from my viewpoint.
michaelkjohnson
"He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book."
Linux Application Development -- Ben Franklin
http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad/
More information about the devel
mailing list