[Fwd: [Bug 23679] NTLM auth for HTTP]

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 23:10, Carwyn Edwards wrote:
> > Damn Straight! I am so ready for this. I run our Intranet, and I have 
> > IIS (yuk) running it, just so there is a transparent login for our 
> > users.  I personaly dont care if it asks for my username and password, 
> > as long as I can be on one box and work.
> 
> The other option for single sign on is something like:
> http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/kerb_pki/

Yes. But those news are for people who, like me, don't run non-Free
Software but have to co-exist in a network with too many non-Free
Software programs running, some of them beyond their power to make a
change.

I've been having to use an ntlm proxy but it's definitely not perfect :|

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20031119/363b5eb9/attachment-0002.bin