yum tries to update gpgme03 with gpgme?
Michael Schwendt
ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de
Tue Nov 25 09:38:23 UTC 2003
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:22:01 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > # rpm -e gpgme
> > # rpm -qa 'gpgme*'
> > gpgme03-0.3.15-0.fdr.2.1
> > # rpm -q --whatrequires gpgme03
> > sylpheed-gpg-0.9.7-0.fdr.1
> >
> > # yum -y install gpgme
> > [...]
> > Resolving dependencies
> > .package sylpheed-gpg needs libgpgme.so.6 (not provided)
> > package sylpheed-gpg needs gpgme03 >= 0:0.3.10 (not provided)
> >
>
> look at the dependencies of these two packages, I'll bet you find some
> sort of conflict.
Well, I need assistance. Else I would have submitted a bug report straight
away. What exactly should I search for? How is above error message to
be interpreted correctly?
If we agree on the same terminology when using the term "conflict",
gpgme03, gpgme and sylpheed-gpg don't conflict.
> > What did happen there? What does that error mean? Did Yum want to upgrade
> > gpgme03 with gpgme? The following makes me think that might be true:
> >
>
> you might want to check for obsoletes b/t these two but yum doesn't not
> view gpgme03 as gpgme
If we agree on the same terminology when using the term "obsoletes",
gpgme03 and gpgme don't obsolete anything.
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20031125/71caea7e/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list