Retain upgrade paths (was: /etc/redhat-release?)

[ne...]

On Sep 25, 2003 at 12:21, Jens Knutson in a maddening rage wrote:

>On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 12:06, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>> On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:44, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> > FWIW, I don't see why not.  dBase II and RHEL 2.1 come to mind :-)
>> 
>> Or worse than that. The first version of LaTeX was called 2.09!
>
>I think it's a good idea, especially a nice random sounding number like
>"2.09", just for the Discordian value.
How about 8.1. This would surely satisfy those ppl who were
waiting for RH8.1 and got RH9.

-- 
Registered Linux User # 125653 (http://counter.li.org)
Switch to: http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/190653
If a guru falls in the forest with no one to hear him, was he really a
guru at all?
		-- Strange de Jim, "The Metasexuals"
 16:01:36  up 32 days,  3:36,  4 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00