free software guidelines

[Rodrigo Del C. Andrade]

	Wtf?!
	Why?!?!

	Er.. sorry, it was the shock. But now, serioulsy: why?! Pine is great!


	Vantroy


Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Havoc Pennington (hp at redhat.com) said: 
> 
>>On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 16:18, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>>
>>>I'm wondering if there are any free software guidelines for Fedora. Most
>>>specifically, I'm wondering if Luxi fonts will continue to be
>>>distributed with Fedora.
>>>
>>>Anybody knows details?
>>
>>There aren't detailed guidelines yet. My view is that we can be a bit
>>more liberal about font licenses than software licenses. I would like to
>>see us be both FSF and opensource.org approved for the software in the
>>distribution, though. Only thing I know of that isn't OK right now is
>>pine.
> 
> 
> pine isn't included.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
>