RFC: fedora.us QA approval format
Aurelien Bompard
gauret at free.fr
Fri Apr 2 12:27:45 UTC 2004
Hi Patrice,
>> - Check of the srpm md5sum (if it exists)
>
> Maybe here there could be a check that the srpm doesn't install anything
> wrong (that is doesn't contain paths) ?
Could you clarify that ? I thought the srpm could only contain the sources
and the spec file, without paths. Can it be different ?
>> - Download of the sources, with md5sum check
>
> Maybe the download should't be automatic, such that it is possible to
> check that the download url is really the right url (presumably searching
> first the project home page with google, in order not to use the url
> provided in the srpm, and verifying that it is the right download page),
> and not one with bad package ?
Right now, you get to look at the spec file after the sources check. Then
you can paste the url in you browser and check the location.
>> - Support for livna packages
>
> What does this mean ?
Packages in the non-us section of fedora.us are at rpm.livna.org (usualy,
the problem is software patents or DMCA). This is equivalent to non-us in
Debian and PLF in Mandrake. They use a bugzilla at bugzilla.livna.org and
have the same procedure as fedora.us
> Anyway this script is a very good idea.
Thanks for you support !
Aurélien
--
http://gauret.free.fr ~~~~ Jabber : gauret at amessage.info
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
More information about the devel
mailing list