Extend RH9 support beyond FC2 release
Stephen Smoogen
smoogen at lanl.gov
Wed Apr 28 19:38:08 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 13:31, Peter Backlund wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday 27 April 2004 23:34, Peter Backlund wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Given that FC2 is scheduled to be released on May 17, would it be
> >>possible to extend the errata lifetime for RH9 by one month, making
> >>EOL happen on May 31 instead of April 30? That would allow for a
> >>smooth upgrade from RH9 to FC2, with a few days to the mirrors to
> >>catch up, some margin for delays and even time for the most common
> >>quirks to hit the faqs.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >http://www.fedoralegacy.org
> >
> Yes, I am aware of Fedora Legacy. The point was that, however, that
> since the dates of RH9 EOL and FC2 release are not very far apart, it
> would be fairly easy to allow RH9 users to go directly to FC2, without
> having to go via Fedora Legacy or run FC1 for two weeks. Smoother
> transition.
>
I doubt anyone would want to run FC2 right after it comes out in a
production environment.. that would mean they should then extend support
another 6 months or so.
I doubt that would happen, so I would say that if you are looking to
transition goto FC1 and then figure out when you are ready to go to FC2.
> /Peter Backlund
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen at lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --
More information about the devel
mailing list