i486 base architecture
Nicholas Miell
nmiell at comcast.net
Thu Dec 2 03:37:46 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:07 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> OK, to summarize:
>
> a) There's a whole lot of pain and not much gain messing with
> package file names (and file paths and scripts and ... )
> b) The dependency
> Requires: cpu(cmov)
> (or equivalent token) might (*will* imho) be useful identifying
> packages that actually use, say, cmov.
> (Note: there's more than cmov that needs marking, generalizing
> the cpu(...) name space is quite straightforward.)
> c) Users want a clear call on what package file name to install, as
> some *.i386.rpm will not run on arch i386, very confusing.
> d) linuxthreads needs to die! die! die! (but that's just me ;-)
>
> Name your poison (if any) please.
What's going to Provide: cpu(cmov)?
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell at comcast.net>
More information about the devel
mailing list