svn or arch

[Neal D. Becker]

seth vidal wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 10:21 -0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> > Yes - Cristian Gafton did months of extensive
>> > testing to see if either
>> > could stand up to the load of internal and external
>> > checkins on the
>> > scale red hat does with distributions.
>> > 
>> > He found that cvs was the only one to stand up to
>> > the load.
>> 
>> Ok thanks for the quick reply. are the results
>> available anywhere. It would be nice to let the
>> svn/arch developers know about this. I am pretty sure
>> they would be interested
> 
> You can ask - but i'm not sure they are.
> 
> I know of them anecdotally - However, from what I know of Gafton he had
> good reason for saying what he said.
> 
> -sv
> 
> 

You might want to look at darcs.  This one looks the most promising, in it's
design.  Only disadvantage, it's written in Haskell.