FreeTDS

[Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens]

Ok, that would mean (for example)
main package ships *only* libct.so.2.0.0, nothing more
and the devel package would ship the symlink libct.so to libct.so.2.0.0
After one compiled e.g. php, php *knows* it needs libct.so.2.0.0 and
therefore doesn't need the symlink to libct.so anymore, and the devel
could be whiped away after all.

Am I right ?

Michael Schwendt schrieb:

>On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:33:26 +0100, Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Ok.
>>I first thought it was about *all* .so files.
>>But why don't the symlinks don't belong into main ?
>>Don't they need to be there for versioning ?
>>    
>>
>
>What kind of "versioning"?
>
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-December/msg00705.html
>
>  
>