svn or arch

[Rahul Sundaram]

Hi

> 
> Interesting. Any plans for RedHat/Fedora to switch
> to Conary?
> One difference between this proposal and conary is
> that we would
> try to remain compatible with a .rpm based system.
> In other
> words, the output of our system would be regular
> .src.rpm's
> that could be built/installed/etc. by existing
> tools.

rpm might be considered a legacy format if conary is
choosen but I am not sure its past the experimental
stage yet. It has been developed by ex redhat guys and
I saw a few people blogging about it. The presentation
on kernel meet was interesting

=====
Regards
Rahul Sundaram


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good. 
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com