Python package packaging question

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 17:23 -0500, Toshio wrote:
[snip]
> > Some packages include the byte-compiled versions of their scripts to
> > avoid this.  Personally I think all packages which include python
> > scripts should include both the .pyc and .pyo files (and that the
> > default RPM configuration should automate this), but I don't think
> > there's ever been a consensus on that.
> > 
> I'd like to see consensus because I see a potential to generate some
> boilerplate code for python packaging if we can agree on what the
> standard should be.
> 
A good idea that I have been musing about - thanks for the reminder.

See attachment to the Fedora.us bugzilla entry for fedora-rpmdevtools:
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1167

Regards,

Michel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20040203/827b6390/attachment-0002.bin