PuTTY 0.54 rpms (http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/)

[Gavin Henry]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 20 February 2004 00:10, Dag Wieers wrote:
> Hi Gavin,
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > for anyone that is interested I have made some rpms for the New Linux
> > version of PuTTY (http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/)
> >
> > I have hosted the rpms here:
> >
> > http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/md5sums
> > http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty-0.54-0.1.noarch.rpm
> > http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty.spec
> > http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty-0.54-0.1.src.rpm
>
> I looked at your SPEC file and compared it what I had. I have the
> following differences:
>
> 	+ What is the reason for choosing noarch ?
> 	+ No desktop entry
> 	+ No desktop icon
> 	+ No manpages (there are 2 missing since the last release though)
> 	+ You have a static version-less dependency for gtk+
> 	+ Don't use %makeinstall where possible

Cheers Dag, I will look over this and reply later today.

>
> You can compare it with:
>
> 	http://dag.wieers.com/packages/putty/putty.spec
>
> > Should I submit these to the Fedora QA team and update the specfile
> > Fedora standards and to fdr extension?
>
> For those interested for RHEL21, RH73, RH80, RH90, RHEL3 and RHFC1 at:
>
> 	http://dag.wieers.com/packages/putty/
>
> Kind regards,
> --   dag wieers,  dag at wieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
> [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

- -- 
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry.
Director.

Open Source. Open Solutions.
http://www.suretecsystems.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFANbnOeWseh9tzvqgRAmReAJ9C4IfOkCHM92BmGiXGBQAMuJx0KQCePX+q
dKvI7ycQR5vMQ6zaimBV64E=
=Qefr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----