Closing bugs UPSTREAM
Mark McLoughlin
markmc at redhat.com
Sun Feb 22 13:11:53 UTC 2004
Hi Leonard,
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 12:56, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> It seems we have a slightly different interpretation of what the tag
> UPSTREAM means, the difference being that I believe only bugs that are
> not yet solved upstream should be closed as UPSTREAM.
I'm trying to figure out what you think doing it this way would achieve
... I may be missing something here, you know :-)
Cheers,
Mark.
More information about the devel
mailing list