Fedora Core 2 Test 2 - delayed

[Vincent]

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:39:50 -0500
"Bruce A. Locke" <blocke at shivan.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 19:39, Vincent wrote:
> 
> > I thought Fedora wasn't vulnerable to that bug due to exec-shield. Packard never
> > saw that one comming!
> 
> This comment makes me curious.  Has anyone been testing the recent user
> space vulnerabilities and seeing if exec-shield + prelink randomization
> prevented at least some of them from being exploited?
> 
> Just curious...
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bruce A. Locke
> blocke at shivan.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Yes _some_ have been tested behind the scenes but the results aren't public yet
from what I gather. All I've heard is that X wasn't vuln.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20040228/7200ce90/attachment-0002.bin