Why KAME/racoon sucks (was: OpenSWAN ANNOUCEMENT)

[Dax Kelson]

On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 12:04, Michael K. Johnson wrote:

> It's really required for a lot of setups, and it's one of the key
> features that makes me feel that it is probably worth the trouble
> if OpenSWAN 2.x is ready in time.

Plus the OpenSWAN developers say that they have no problem accepting
patches from Americans. This way, if needed, RH can feed patches
upstream.

I heard that the "no-patches-from-americans" was one of the major
stumbling block on getting FreeSWAN into RH.

Dax Kelson