FC2 devel/i386 vs VIA EPIA boards

Boszormenyi Zoltan zboszor at freemail.hu
Tue Jan 20 11:03:59 UTC 2004


Leonard den Ottolander írta:
> Hello Zoltán,
> 
> 
>>I just sent in the cpuinfo, I checked it again: cmov is missing.
>>So it's not close to a PII.
> 
> 
> Still that should get you to the package selection stage (at least FC1
> does on my Cyrix P166).
> 
> 
>>No, I could'nt. :-( I can't work around the reboot after the machine pulled
>>the initrd image.
> 
> 
> Did you use a boot image from the rawhide tree instead of the FC1 boot
> disk? If that doesn't work you could try the rpm to (NFS) mount method I
> mentioned in my first post to this thread. That should get you a
> functional system, apart from rpm that is. After that you could have a
> look at the bug report I mentioned, and see if you can get rpm to work.

Yes, I use the rawhide (FC2 devel) images. What I did was
export the fedora/core/development/i386 root directory through
NFS and configured a network installation with redhat-config-netboot.
The said machine pulled vmlinuz and initrd through TFTP and
instantly rebooted. After updating my rawhide tree I copied
the new initrd and vmlinuz from fedora/core/development/i386/images/pxeboot
under /tftp/linux-install/FC2DevI386 and tried again. Same result.
The installation kernel should be compiled generic...

-- 
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

---------------------
What did Hussein say about his knife?
One in Bush worth two in the hand.





More information about the devel mailing list