Updating RPMs using binary deltas (demo)

[Nils Philippsen]

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 08:24, Warren Togami wrote:
> For those folks that want to eventually have optional RPM diffs for 
> upgrades, please do not continue the discussion here.  Instead if you

More importantly than "we don't want to hear that kind of stuff here"
(sorry Warren, but that's how it sounds), this subject is off-topic on
the list. It's not about Fedora, but about RPM, so it might be on-topic
for rpm-list, or maybe even warrants a mailing list of its own. Be aware
of that the some of the bespoke "elders" are on rpm-list, too ;-).

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20040127/eaa81084/attachment-0002.bin