cpuspeed proposal

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 21:44, Warren Togami wrote:
> 4) Either way display [OK] rather than [FAILED] to not alarm the users 
> where cpufreq is not available.

Warren,

What about [PASSED] in yellow?

It's just that OK is a little misleading too.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20040127/990f8eab/attachment-0002.bin