sylpheed (and inclusions)

Pete Zaitcev zaitcev at redhat.com
Wed Jan 28 16:22:21 UTC 2004


On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:32:09 -0500
Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:

> IMO, things like sylpheed, balsa, etc. all eventually should
> probably be in Extras. But I may be in the minority. :)

Right. Might even give in impetus to have Extras functioning properly.
As a sylpheed user, I do not mind it going to Extras.

-- Pete





More information about the devel mailing list