cracklib package incomplete

Daniel Roesen dr at cluenet.de
Thu Jan 29 01:03:30 UTC 2004


On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:27:55PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:36:18AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
> > 
> > Since 2002-07-09 this bug is in NEW state with noone caring obviously.
> > I always get some muddy feeling when I read Red Hat people comments
> > like "if it's not in Bugzilla, it's not there". This is not the first
> > instance where "even if it's in Bugzilla, it was just wasted time"
> > applies... :-(
> 
> Red Hat not perfect, news at 11.

Indeed. :-)

> > The fix is a five-minute-job.
> 
> Can you mark the bug as FC2 so nobody thinks its old and fixed in such cases

Uhm, you mean FC1 I guess?

And while we're at it... similar problem with GDBM.... report open since
2002-09-28, no comment. Unable to compile PHP with GDBM DBA support
because of this.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74643

Upgraded this report to FC1.

On a general note: whats the reasoning behind moving those header files
to a subdirectory? It breaks lots of things if no compat symlinks are
provided, but then you could just leave the headers where they were.
What am I missing?


Best regards,
Daniel





More information about the devel mailing list