nominate for removal: ethereal

[Huw Lynes]

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:43:21 -0400
seth vidal <skvidal at phy.duke.edu> wrote:

> So, would it be completely inappropriate to nominate ethereal for
> removal from fc3 due to its spotty history of security problems?
> 
It may have a spotty security history but it's phenomenally useful. I would be
unhappy to see it go unless there was a package of equivalent functionality to
replace it.

Is there something we should be using instead?

-- 
| Huw Lynes               | The Moving Picture Company  |
| System Administrator    | 127 Wardour Street          |
|.........................| London, W1F 0NL             |