pam bad dependency

John Thacker thacker at math.cornell.edu
Thu Jul 8 14:26:45 UTC 2004


On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:52:17PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello John,
> 
> > The latest RPM for pam in development (-47) still requires glib explicitly,
> > even though it's built against glib2, and should only require glib2.
> 
> Please put this in bugzilla (if it is not already there).

It's there already, as bug 123767
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123767

123767's summary focuses on the BuildRequire as incorrectly requiring
glib-devel instead of glib2-devel, which is a related problem.  pam
is just another package that moved from gtk1 to gtk2, but whose spec
file did not reflect this change.

John Thacker





More information about the devel mailing list