Definition of Open Source [was Re: pine: UW permission to distribute]

[Michael Tiemann]

Ville: sorry for the mis-attribution.

Michael: But perhaps I did understand the diagram--in that I observed
that it didn't attempt to cover new package submission.  Thus, I've
attempted to enhance the diagram so that it /can/ cover that topic
(which is frequently discussed) as well.  So my effort is complementary
to Ville's, not conflicting.

M

On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 17:42, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:44:47 -0400, Michael Tiemann wrote:
> 
> > Finally, a word about the diagram: I think that Warren's recently posted
> > Fedora submissions process was a great start, but it did not reach far
> > enough. 
> 
> I think you've misunderstood the diagram, which is Ville Skyttä's attempt
> at explaining the "fedora.us update submission process" in a non-textual
> way: http://www.fedora.us/wiki/PackageSubmissionQAPolicy#updates
> 
> It simplifies the package update process for the trusted package
> maintainers a lot, since they no longer need to wait for reviews and
> approvals from other people. The diagram does not cover submissions of
> new packages.
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list