Fedora Core 2 Test 2 - delayed

[Jef Spaleta]

Vincent wrote:
> The code is fine but it deserves the extra scrutiny it is getting.

The code is getting scrutiny on this list? At best what we are seeing
here is derision, but certainly no comments on this list count as
code scrutiny.  So maybe its best to say the code deserve the extra
scrutiny it has gotten upstream already before the decision to include
in the 2.6 kernel codebase was made, instead of talking about the lack
of scrutiny its currently getting on this list. No one here, on this
list, is adding anything of merit to the analysis of the codebase.

-jef"maybe open source developers should create bogus code and license
it under a license that is friendly to proprietary consumption....to
hasten the endgame scenario of propetary software development"spaleta
  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20040301/dea1b545/attachment-0002.bin