Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 19:14 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 19:04, seth vidal wrote:
> > I don't think talking about whether or not we like them is useful here.
> > It is the fhs and fedora core should be compliant with it.
> 
> There are plenty of standards out there that are just silly, so
> compliance for the sake of compliance is probably not the best
> approach.  
> 
> Note: I'm not arguing one way or another on this one, just saying that
> using the argument of "it's a standard" is somewhat weak.
> 

How about fhs compliance is something that other distros will have  and
therefore fedora core should have it too.

Are there other standards out their for the file system hierarchy OTHER
than the fhs that fedora or red hat intends to follow? Why is there all
this resistance to this?

-sv