/proc/config.gz support on? Why not?

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 20:29 -0600, Sam Williams wrote:
> Why doesn't FC3 have the /proc/config.gz option turned on by default?
>  It
> adds such a small amount of size to the kernel and it removes the need
> to search and try and locate the config files used to build a given FC3
> kernel release?

all distros put them in /boot/config-`uname -r`.
And... why do you need to config ?

Bloating the kernel for something that's on the fs already sounds like a
bad idea to me.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20041124/351fcbe4/attachment-0002.bin