Splitting off package resolver config files into release package??? (was: What happened to yum and up2date repositories ???)

[Matias Féliciano]

Le lundi 25 octobre 2004 à 09:39 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:34:35PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 21:15 -0200, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > >From my last "yum update"  on, neither yum.conf nor
> > > yum.repositories.d nor up2date related configuration hold any data on
> > > repositories anymore... Consequence: I' m not able to yum or
> > > up2date.....
> > > 
> > > The next thing, I tried to download yum and up2date directly from
> > > download.fedora.redhat.com and rpm -Uvh them... No use: configuration
> > > is still missing.
> > > 
> > > Where I can get the configuration files ???
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > 
> > 
> > 1. you should read the archives of this and the test-list.
> > 2. the configuration files are in the fedora-release package.
> 
> That would have been worth a large heads-up.
> 
> a) splitting off the config files from the packages was a very good
>    thing! It will allow config file updating by Red Hat and/or other
>    parties w/o replacing the binaries,
> 
> b) putting this into fedora-release is bad, no one wants to replace
>    this package, other than fedora derived distros.
> 

It's normal. 
Only fedora derived distros will change /etc/yum.repo.d/* files provided
by fedora-release.

> Could the config files be put into `fedora-config-package' or similar?
> Please? :)

I does not understand your point.
You can provide fedora-release-atrpms with /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20041025/fc5db262/attachment-0002.bin