sound server
"Nils O. Selåsdal"
NOS at Utel.no
Thu Oct 28 19:54:27 UTC 2004
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> John (J5) Palmieri (johnp at redhat.com) said:
>
>>I hadn't gotten to the point of looking at the code yet. I was going to
>>make some test packages, see how it worked as an esd replacement and
>>then go ahead and start looking at it. If it is as you say,
>>impenetrable spaghetti, then I don't want to gain yet another
>>unmaintainable package. Is it your position that the things that are
>>wrong with Polyaudio would be harder to fix than just fixing esd? Or
>>perhaps there are better alternatives around? If we can find a solution
>>that is easy to integrate, maintain and audit I am all for that.
>
>
> Well... direct alsa usage can handle the ESD stuff, as long as you
> don't care about network audio (and someone may want to write a shim
> esd-like layer for playback.)
>
> How important is network audio, anyway?
There are lots of thin client installation, it's important.
More information about the devel
mailing list