mail gui
Nicolas Mailhot
Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net
Sun Oct 31 09:23:33 UTC 2004
Le samedi 30 octobre 2004 à 21:28 -0400, Paul Iadonisi a écrit :
> On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 21:07, Michael A. Peters wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Even in the default case postfix is better. You can run it more
> > securely in a chroot jail than you can sendmail, and it's security
> > record isn't nearly as blemished as sendmail.
>
> That blemished past is pretty far in the past. The number of security
> holes per year has dramatically decreased in recent years. Note that it
> used to be measured in holes/week, but take a look at www.sendmail.org
> and you'll see that the last hole was over a year ago. So it's a matter
> of preference, really. But I'm hoping this doesn't turn into an all-out
> 'my-MTA-is-better-than-yours' religious war. Please let's endeavor to
> not let that happen.
Even if the sendmail codebase finaly reached the quality of its
competitors that's no reason to inflict sendmail conf files on users.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20041031/6e8d2c25/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list