What to do about libc-client (imap)?

[Warren Togami]

Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 06:34:06PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> 
>>Is this really worth more years of headache?  Here are two proposals to 
>>deal with this.
> 
> 
> I don't think there is strong enough motivation to rename the packages.
> If Fedora Extras wishes to maintain an "imap" package then they can do
> so without needing to rename libc-client, modulo bug #132928. So I've
> built a libc-client package without the "Conflicts: imap" to fix that
> bug.

I still maintain that "libc-client" is a horrible name for the package, 
but this is technically acceptable at least.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com