walters at redhat.com
Mon Sep 20 15:21:41 UTC 2004
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 00:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:48:04PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Well, it's not quite the same thing. You can't safely dump a live
> > filesystem, making it unusable for me. Also it's far less granular than
> > an archiver like tar or dar.
> Have you looked at making lvm snapshots and dumping those?
I haven't, mainly because my server is FC2, and I didn't think to use
LVM when setting it up, and I've heard that snapshotting is flaky in the
FC2 version anyways.
However, since new installs default to being on LVM, this might be a
The major problem I see with it though is the granularity and
filesystem-specificity. It probably still makes sense to have a
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20040920/7eced2c3/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel