OpenOffice.org 2.0 packages for FC3?
Nicolas Mailhot
Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net
Wed Apr 6 19:20:51 UTC 2005
Le mercredi 06 avril 2005 à 14:18 -0400, seth vidal a écrit :
> > Not too hard a trick if FC4's openoffice includes
> > Obsoletes: openoffice.org2
> > Provides: openoffice.org2
> > (or whatever name is used for a possible OpenOffice 2.0 Extras package
> > for fc3)
>
> okay, how about we say no b/c it's silly and confusing for users.
>
> the point of extras is not to obsolete functionality in core.
>
> no, b/c it's a waste of time.
Moreover how about "extras can depend on core features but core should
not have to track extras, especially another release extras ?"
The trick work but is a priority inversion if I've ever seen one.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050406/52096260/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list