OpenOffice.org 2.0 packages for FC3?

Nicolas Mailhot Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net
Wed Apr 6 19:20:51 UTC 2005


Le mercredi 06 avril 2005 à 14:18 -0400, seth vidal a écrit :
> > Not too hard a trick if FC4's openoffice includes
> > Obsoletes: openoffice.org2
> > Provides: openoffice.org2
> > (or whatever name is used for a possible OpenOffice 2.0 Extras package 
> > for fc3)
> 
> okay, how about we say no b/c it's silly and confusing for users.
> 
> the point of extras is not to obsolete functionality in core.
> 
> no, b/c it's a waste of time.

Moreover how about "extras can depend on core features but core should
not have to track extras, especially another release extras ?"

The trick work but is a priority inversion if I've ever seen one.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050406/52096260/attachment-0002.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list