yum clean bug
Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
strange at nsk.no-ip.org
Thu Dec 8 22:15:41 UTC 2005
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:59:34PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 23:51 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 15:55 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > > On 12/8/05, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange at nsk.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > > > Yes. Because I'm doing cache operations, not repository operations. Or
> > > > rather, that's what I thought I was doing, so it would be intuitive to
> > > > me.
> > >
> > > So for completeness what your saying is that you think
> > > yum clean packages should clean all packages from all enabled and
> > > disabled repos by default?
> > >
> > > and yum clean headers should clean all headers from all enabled and
> > > disabled repos by default?
> >
> > Well, I actually think it should.
>
>
> Seriously? That seems completely backward to me.
>
> it's like saying rsync --exclude=/some/path should not actually exclude
> that path.
>
> or that a disabled samba share shouldn't ACTUALLY be disabled.
Bad analogies. We're talking about cache data.
I don't even understand why is it necessary to gather repositories
configuration.
Don't forget that current behaviour makes it unable to delete cache for
repositories no longer configurated. Unless by hand.
--
lfr
0/0
More information about the devel
mailing list