KDE 3.5

[Arthur Pemberton]

Hey, i would LOVE to install and test, but I just don't have an extra/spare
machine that I can chance such stuff on.

On 12/22/05, Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus at tmus.dk> wrote:
>
> Eric Tanguy wrote:
> > I would like to know why this version was pushed directly in FC-4 and
> > not in update-testing before. This would avoid the problem with k3b!!
> > Now we have to wait a k3b update to make it run.
> > Thanks
> > Eric
> >
>
> Anybody feel free to kick in and correct me if i'm wrong here, but...
>
> I believe it's been mentioned on this list somewhere before, that
> updates-testing is probably not getting the attention (it should?) from
> a wide variety of testers. My feeling is that updates-testing is
> *mostly* being used by people who have a bugzilla for productX and needs
> to test if their bug has gone away and stuff like this.
> This may or may not be intentional (or even true), but that's what I
> seem to recall from previous discussions.
>
> If it had been in updates-testing, would you have taken the time to
> seriously and thoroughly testing it?
>
> If yes, then it's too bad it didn't go to updates-testing, if not it
> wouldn't have helped much. With a limited number of people using
> updates-testing, some weird bug was probably going to make it through
> anyway.
>
> Anyway, hope this helps in some way.
>
> /Thomas
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>



--
As a boy I jumped through Windows, as a man I play with Penguins.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20051222/3ef02b25/attachment-0002.html