Royalty free gstreamer plug-in
sundaram at redhat.com
Tue Dec 27 14:04:09 UTC 2005
>>Do you mean the stance on providing only open source software without restrictions?
>Yes. And that's not to say that I disagree with the stance. In fact, I
>agree with it given that "restrictions" are well-defined.
Right. The restrictions are pretty well defined at this point. The
project goals are well advertised and active on the lists I believe
knows about it.
>belligerent about looking into potential workarounds is not a show of
>good faith. And, when you do not show good faith, you lose people.
>Maybe you don't care; that's fine. But, it's good to be reminded that
>the stances we take can and will alienate a bunch of people. It's the
>truth whether you "much rather change the world instead of going along
>with it" or not.
How is a Free and open source stance not showing good faith? . There
are over seventy distributions based on Fedora. Its not religion or
whims. Yes it will alienate a few proprietary software supporters who
will have to get the software from elsewhere. What exactly is your
solution that you are suggesting?. Vague notions dont help resolve
Learn. Network. Experience open source.
Red Hat Summit Nashville | May 30 - June 2, 2006
Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
More information about the devel