FC5 and Yum Plugins

Sat Dec 31 18:31:47 UTC 2005

On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:17:02PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 11:49 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Er, or just volunteer to package mythtv for livna?

That is the second time this suggestion comes up in this thread. What
makes livna and ATrpms different, or say livna preferable to ATrpms in
this context? At the beginning of this thread some people posted about
livna replacing packages just as well.

Just for the note: Fedora itself, when it wasn't merged with RHL (aka
fedora.us) decided to have vendor packages replaced. packages like
shadow-utils or rpm itself.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20051231/23106cc9/attachment-0002.bin 