Packaging idea (Re: What next?)

[Konstantin Ryabitsev]

On 6/2/05, seth vidal <skvidal at phy.duke.edu> wrote:
> > c. Their software is licensed so that it cannot be put in Extras.
> 
> yep. that's the use case I figured from the .fap file you were
> describing before.

Yes, I cannot deny that the last 2 weeks spent packaging nonfree
software has greatly influenced this post. :) That, plus the sad fact
that even though several vendors provide .rpm files, they are utterly
unusable because they try to be installable on as many things as
possible, and always end up sucking on all.

-- 
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Zlotniks, INC

"Выслухаў мядзьведзь казку і адарваў сабе хвост."