The situation with libwww.

[Bill Nottingham]

Jesse Keating (jkeating at j2solutions.net) said: 
> On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 15:31 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > W3C stopped maintaining libwww three years ago
> > (http://www.w3.org/Library/). 
> > So, what should one do after finding a bunch of major, but
> > non-security 
> > related flaws in libwww?
> 
> Bribe somebody to take it over and possibly somebody else to package it
> for Extras?

Yeah, it's headed out of Core RSN anyway - the only dep in core
is a obsolete buildreq that's not actually needed.

Bill