OO.org2

[Thomas Fitzsimmons]

On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:42 +0000, Carwyn Edwards wrote:
>Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>
>>We're planning on
>>natively-compiling rawhide ant
>>
>Will this have an alternatives setup so that you can run a non native 
>ant too?
>

No, that isn't needed.  The java and javac alternatives cover this.  If
they point to java-1.4.2-gcj-compat and java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-devel ant
will run natively on a completely Free Software stack.  If they point to
a proprietary SDK then ant will run interpreted/JIT'ed on the non-free
JVM.

Tom