rawhide report: 20050310 changes

[Harnish, Joseph]

The main developers of DKMS are on the linux-poweredge at dell dot com
mailing list.  They would be able to help shed some light on this.

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jason L Tibbitts
III
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:19 PM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20050310 changes

>>>>> "RE" == Ralf Ertzinger <fedora-devel at camperquake.de> writes:

RE> It would require to make the development package a requirement for
RE> every install.

Only if you use DKMS as is.  But if you take it as a starting point
(i.e. what Mr. Rugolsky suggested) and make its output not an
installed module but a kernel-module-whatever RPM then end users
wouldn't need the development packages.

I guess the question is whether DKMS can be so modified and if so
whether the result would be better than whatever other solutions
people have come up with.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050311/9640cc74/attachment-0002.html