Openness: Apache as a guiding model (was Re: GFS removed??? )

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:18:36AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:12 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > For one I fail to see any connection of the issues at hand (GFS kernel
> > modules) with extras, so forcing people to contribute to extras just
> > because they want to contribute to FC/RHEL seems to be very wrong.
> 
> Extras is the entry point to the Fedora Project.  Fedora Project is the
> entry point to RHEL.  Why is this so hard to understand?

So this list should be scraped? And GFS will make its reappearance in
Fedora Extras?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050317/c82c349d/attachment-0002.bin