some artwork needs to be replaced...?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 10:10 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> And i certainly do not think that the red hat logo on the desktop that
> we have enjoyed for so long, is any more appropriate or even more
> informational than a separate fedora project logo. I think its very
> important and very informational to be able to distinguish which
> distribution you are using at a glance at the default desktop even
> with windows open obscuring the wallpaper. The fedora logo on the
> gnome panel finally makes a clearly visible distinction that someone
> is on a fedora desktop and not on a rhel system.  As a matter of
> function and informative content.. any fedora specific logo is a
> change for the better.  And there is absolutely no point in arguing
> about the style of the logo.. matters of style have no right answer
> and the style of the logo isn't going to change.

Agreed, FWIW, and I for one would like to see the new logo appear in the
FC4 branch (i.e. an update) to get everyone used to it... or at least
get the inevitable deluge of complaints out of the way to make way for
more appropriate traffic subsequent to the FC5 test releases.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20051118/fab622ff/attachment-0002.bin