suggestion: move all java packages to extras

[Brian Pepple]

On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 10:43 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> B/c of the rapidly evolving nature of the gcj and related java tools,
> what if we moved them to extras so that work on those packages could be
> both public and move faster?
> 
> It would be a big savings on the size of core and it seems like adding
> those packages over there would be the most correct as the java packages
> don't really have any necessary reason to be in core.
> 
> What do you think?

+1.

I'm all in favor of reducing the size of core. Hopefully, someday it can
be whittled down to 1 cd.

Though, isn't the openoffice.org packages dependent on several of the
java tools?

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20051126/6bf754dc/attachment-0002.bin