status of up2date and rhn-applet
wrrhdev at riede.org
Sun Nov 27 03:07:20 UTC 2005
On 11/26/2005 05:33:56 PM, Jack Tanner wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>> On the topic of notifications.... would it be possible for have room
>> in the notification metadata for a "repo notification"? When a person
> Speaking generally, would it help the user experience if yum/pup could warn
> the user if a package installed from repo A is about to be replaced with a
> package from repo B?
> This notification could come up when the user enables a repo for the first
> time, and/or when the replacement is actually about to happen.
> The user would ideally then be able to set a pref to be warned a) never, b)
> only if a package from core is replaced, c) every time a cross-repo upgrade
> is about to take place.
> So that we don't break the nightly yum update, cross-repo upgrades should
> get logged. If the user chooses to be warned along scenarios B or C, the log
> could contain a message like "We did not upgrade package X to version Y from
> repo FOO, because it was originally installed from repo BAR."
> I guess the general idea is that every package gets affiliated to a
> preferred repo at time of first install of that package, and users can
> expect to rely on that behavior.
> This would help with both the updates-testing problem that Jeff and Jeremy
> are talking about, also help Willem's poblem, because neither atrpms nor
> updates-testing would override packages when they shouldn't.
It would be useful (I have often wished it did) if e.g. yum list x would not
just tell me some release of x is installed, but also from which repo it came
when it was installed. But I'm not sure the rpm database contains that
information, so this may not be possible?
Thanks, Willem Riede.
More information about the devel