Unofficial FC4.1 i386 isos

[Jeff Pitman]

On Saturday 17 September 2005 05:33, Warren Togami wrote:
> http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/1398/
> As for the kernel I personally think 1398 is far less problematic for
> most folks than 1447.  I copied all of the 1398 kernels for you here
> if you want to try that instead.  Or maybe you should wait for a
> better new FC4 update kernel to hit the official tree.

If it's that bad, why didn't we rollback to 1398 after the discovery of 
badness?

-- 
-jeff