giflib for fc5

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:54 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Thanks, OK great.  It would be helpful if you could provide a proposed 
> .src.rpm replacement for download and peer review to this list in a way 
> similar to an Extras package review request.  That way folks here can 
> test it and suggest other improvements while we follow the process for 
> replacement in Fedora Core.
> 
> I suppose we want both Obsoletes and Provides of the N-V-R of libungif 
> and also matching -devel?

Here's a spec file for giflib that doesn't quite work.  It's a port of
the libungif spec file with a few cleanups similar to what we'd do if
the package was moving to Fedora Extras.

The not quite working portion is the virtual Provides.  I think I'm
running squarely into the issues exposed here:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-May/msg00133.html
and explained in this post:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-May/msg00175.html

Should I try something like:
  %ifarch x86_64
  Provides: libungif.so.4()((64bit)
  %else
  Provides: libungif.so.4
  %endif

or is that too much of a hack?  Are there other archs (ppc64?) that need to be %ifarch'd?

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: giflib.spec
Type: application/x-extension-spec
Size: 2985 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050920/76da4314/attachment-0004.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20050920/76da4314/attachment-0005.bin